Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation

Authors

  • João Tavares Calixto Júnior Faculdade de Juazeiro do Norte
  • Marcos Antônio Drumond Embrapa Semi-Árido

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4336/2014.pfb.34.80.670

Keywords:

Thorny deciduous vegetation, Phytosociology, Ecological sucession

Abstract

The objective of this work was the comparison of vegetation structure of two Caatinga fragments with primary and secondary levels of ecological succession, located at Embrapa Semiarido, Petrolina, State of Pernambuco, Brazil. For floristic survey it was used the method of plots, where 10 sampling units of 8 m x 40 m randomly distributed were plotted. All living individuals with diameter at ground level (DGL) ≥ 3 cm were inventoried and also measured their total heights. We observed significant differences in the diametric structure, but the distribution of hypsometric frequency showed that the majority of individuals in both areas were small-sized (< 5 m). Through similarity analysis and principal coordinates, we observed the formation of three distinct groups when compared to other surveys in Caatinga sensu stricto. The results showed that the studied areas have floristic richness compatible with Caatinga environments, the fragments are in early stages (Area I) and intermediate succession (Area II) and 30 years of regeneration were not enough for area I to achieve a level of development similar to the ecologically better conserved area.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

João Tavares Calixto Júnior, Faculdade de Juazeiro do Norte

http://lattes.cnpq.br/9600618816271612

Marcos Antônio Drumond, Embrapa Semi-Árido

http://lattes.cnpq.br/1346750351605800

Published

2014-12-26

How to Cite

CALIXTO JÚNIOR, João Tavares; DRUMOND, Marcos Antônio. Comparative study of phytosociological structure of two fragments of Caatinga in different levels of conservation. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, [S. l.], v. 34, n. 80, p. 345–355, 2014. DOI: 10.4336/2014.pfb.34.80.670. Disponível em: https://pfb.cnpf.embrapa.br/pfb/index.php/pfb/article/view/670. Acesso em: 19 may. 2024.

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.