The Spanish National Forest Inventory: history, development, challenges and perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2017.pfb.37.91.1337Keywords:
Monitoring, Biodiversity, Forest assessmentAbstract
It is important to have a statistically robust forest information data base which can be updated and can provide long-term information. National Forest Inventories (NFI) provide one of the best large-scale sources of information, and therefore are a cornerstone of forest policies. The scopes of NFIs, which are the primary source of data for national and large-area assessments, has been broadened to include new variables to meet increasing information requirements. This paper describes the history, methodology and guidance of Spanish NFI and international requirements. The current objectives are determined by analysing future perspectives and possible direction of future assessments. These objectives include harmonization of NFI, open data source and to broaden the number of field variables monitored (multi-objective inventory) in order to effectively fulfil information requirements.Downloads
References
Alberdi, A. I. et al. National forest inventories report, Spain. In: Tomppo, E. et al. (Ed.). National forest inventories: pathways for common reporting. New York: Springer, 2010. p. 529-540.
Alberdi, I. et al. A long-scale biodiversity monitoring methodology for Spanish national forest inventory: application to Ãlava region. Forest Systems, v. 23, n. 1, p. 93-110, 2014. DOI: 10.5424/fs/2014231-04238.
Alberdi I. et al. A new method for the identification of old-growth trees in National Forest Inventories: application to Pinus halepensis Mill. stands in Spain. Annals of Forest Sciences, v. 70, n. 3, p. 277-285, 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-012-0261-9.
Alberdi, I. Metodología para la estimación de indicadores armonizados a partir de los inventarios forestales nacionales europeos con especial énfasis en la biodiversidad forestal. 2015. Thesis (Doctoral) - E.T.S. I. de Montes, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid.
Bravo, F. et al. El diseño de las parcelas del Inventario Forestal Nacional y la estimación de variables dasométricas. In: ______. (Ed.). El Inventario Forestal Nacional como elemento clave para la gestión forestal sostenible. [Valladolid]: Fundación General de la Universidad de Valladolid, 2002. p. 19-35.
España. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. Criterios e indicadores de gestión forestal sostenible en los bosques españoles. Madrid, 2012. 75 p.
España. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Tercer inventario forestal nacional 1997-2007: Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco/Euskadi: Ãlava/Araba. [Madrid]: Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales, 2008. 410 p.
European Union. Regulation (EU) nº 377/2014 of The European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 establishing the Copernicus Programme and repealing Regulation (EU) nº 911/2010. Official Journal of the European Union, n. 377, p. 44-66, 3 Apr. 2014.
Fernández-Olalla, M. et al. Selección de especies y efecto del ciervo (Cervus elaphus L.) sobre arbustedos y matorrales de los Montes de Toledo, España Central. Investigacion Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, v. 15, n. 3, p. 329-338, 2006.
Fischer, R. & Lorenz, M. (Ed.). Forest condition in Europe, 2011 technical report of ICP forests and FutMon. Hamburg: Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institute, Institute for World Forestry, 2011. (Work report of the institute for world forestry, 2011/1).
Guby, N. A. & Dobbertin, M. Quantitative estimates of coarse woody debris and standing dead trees in selected Swiss forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography, v. 5, n. 6, p. 327-341, 1996. DOI: 10.2307/2997588.
Hunter, M. L. Wildlife, forests and forestry: principles of managing forests for biological diversity. Boston: Prentice-Hall, 1990. 370 p.
Instituto Nacional para la ConservacioÌn de la Naturaleza (España). Segundo inventario forestal nacional, 1986-1995: explicaciones y métodos. Madrid: ICONA, 1990. 174 p.
McRoberts, R. E. et al. Advances and emerging issues in national forest inventories. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, v. 25, n. 4, p. 368-381, 2010.
McRoberts, R. E. & Tomppo, E. O. Remote sensing support for forest inventories. Remote Sensing of Environment, v. 110, n. 4, p. 412-419, 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.09.034.
Robla González, E. & Vallejo Bombín, R. El mapa forestal de España a escala 1: 25.000: continuación y actualización de un proyecto. In: CONGRESO FORESTAL ESPAÑOL, 5., 2009. [Conferencias y ponencias]. Madrid: Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales, 2010. (Cuadernos de la Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales, 31).
Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, v. 27, p. 379-423, 623-656, 1948.
Tomppo, E. et al. (Ed.). National forest inventories: pathways for common reporting. [Cham]: Springer, 2010. p. 597- 609.
Vallejo, R. & Sandoval, V. J. El Inventario Forestal Nacional. Foresta, v. 57, p. 16-25, 2013.
Vidal, C. et al. Establishing forest inventory reference definitions for forest and growing stock: a study towards common reporting. Silva Fennica, v. 42, n. 2, p. 247-266, 2008.
Vidal, C. et al. The role of National Forest Inventories for international forestry reporting. Annals of Forest Science, v. 73, n. 4, p. 793-806, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-016-0545-6.
Villanueva, J. A. El cotejo entre el primer y segundo inventario forestal nacional. Ecología, v. 11, p. 169-176, 1997.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH reserves the right to correct grammar, improve clarity, and impose PFB standard although respecting the author's style.
Final proof version will be sent to the correspondence author.
Published papers will become property of the BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH.
Published papers may be used by the authors, without previous PFB authorization, allowed when source is cited.
Any mention of trademarks or methods do not imply in its recommended by the Editorial Committee.
The authors are the exclusive responsible for opinions and concepts developed in the manuscript.