Evaluation of eucalypt clones in Ponta Porã, Mato Grosso do Sul State Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2014.pfb.34.80.569Keywords:
Eucalyptus spp., Clonal test, REML/BLUP, Genotypes x environments interactionAbstract
The objective of this work was to evaluate eucalypt commercial clones in Ponta Porã region, located in Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil. Two clonal tests were established in 2009. Each field trial consisted of five clones (AEC 144, AEC 224, GG 100, 58 and 1277) and three commercial seed checks (Eucalyptus grandis, Eucalyptus urophylla and the hybrid Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis). The experiments were designed as randomized blocks, with four replicates and square plots containing 25 (trial 1) and 16 plants (trial 2), at the spacing of 3 m x 3 m. At the age of 51 months, the circumference at breast height and the total height were assessed. From the collected data, we estimated the volume of wood per tree. We also carried out some phenotypic analysis based on silvicultural traits. The clones AEC 144 and AEC 224 exhibited the best performance for volume of wood. The use of these clones in commercial stands will make possible good productive, if adequate silvicultural techniques are applied.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Cristiane Aparecida Fioravante Reis, Paulo Eduardo Telles dos Santos, Estefano Paludzyszyn Filho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH reserves the right to correct grammar, improve clarity, and impose PFB standard although respecting the author's style.
Final proof version will be sent to the correspondence author.
Published papers will become property of the BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH.
Published papers may be used by the authors, without previous PFB authorization, allowed when source is cited.
Any mention of trademarks or methods do not imply in its recommended by the Editorial Committee.
The authors are the exclusive responsible for opinions and concepts developed in the manuscript.