Hypsometric relation for candeia (Eremanthus erythropappus) under different planting spacings in Minas Gerais, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2012.pfb.32.71.257Keywords:
Hypsometric models, Height/diameter relation, Identity of modelsAbstract
The objective of this work was to adjust traditional models of hypsometric relations for homogeneous candeia stands, under different initial spacings. Ten models were adjusted for hypsometric relations. The assessment criteria obeyed the highest determination coefficient and the lowest standard error of estimate in percentage. The F test was also evaluated, as well as the significance of the regression coefficients, the graphical analysis of the residues and the identity test when the same model was selected for different treatments. It was observed that, over time, the hypsometric curves reduce their tilt, move to the right and elevate, reducing the interval among them from the sixth year. The traditional hypsometric relation models as Henricksen, Stofells, Assman, Trorey and Curtis are efficient to estimate the total height of candeia in homogeneous stands and under different initial spacing in Minas Gerais State, BrazilDownloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Emanuel José Gomes de Araújo, Allan Libanio Pelissari, Hassan Camil David, José Roberto Soares Scolforo, Sylvio Péllico Netto, Vinícius Augusto Morais
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH reserves the right to correct grammar, improve clarity, and impose PFB standard although respecting the author's style.
Final proof version will be sent to the correspondence author.
Published papers will become property of the BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF FORESTRY RESEARCH.
Published papers may be used by the authors, without previous PFB authorization, allowed when source is cited.
Any mention of trademarks or methods do not imply in its recommended by the Editorial Committee.
The authors are the exclusive responsible for opinions and concepts developed in the manuscript.